Under New Law, First Responders Could Face Fines For Photographing Victims Of Accidents Without Consent

Legislation sponsored by Assemblymen Craig Coughlin and Herb Conaway, Jr, M.D. that would prohibit first responders from photographing or disclosing pictures of accident victims and patients to the public without their consent has been signed into law.

“This is not an injunction on our first responders, who act bravely and save lives, but the callous few who violate the privacy of the people they are charged with protecting,” said Coughlin (D-Middlesex). “In an era where photos and videos can live in perpetuity online, no family should ever have to worry about distressing images of their loved ones being displayed without their consent.”

The new law prohibits a first responder who is dispatched to or present at the scene of a motor vehicle accident or other emergency situation, for the purpose of providing medical care or other assistance, from photographing, filming, videotaping, recording, or otherwise reproducing in any manner, the image of a person being provided medical care or other assistance, except in accordance with applicable rules, regulations or operating procedures of the agency employing the first responder. The law does not ban the personnel from photographing scenes which do not include patients.

“Situations that require emergency medical attention are distressing enough without a victim or their family members having to worry about their privacy being invaded,” said Conaway (D-Burlington). “This is a matter of respect and dignity, especially given the fact that victims or patients are usually in no position to grant authorization to these images.”

The law defines “first responder” as a law enforcement officer, paid or volunteer firefighter, paid or volunteer member of a duly incorporated first aid, emergency, ambulance or rescue squad association, or any other individual who, in the course of his employment, is dispatched to the scene of a motor vehicle accident or other emergency situation for the purpose of providing medical care or other assistance.

The law also prohibits a first responder from disclosing any photograph, film, videotape, record or other reproduction of the image of a person being provided medical care or other assistance at the scene of a motor vehicle accident or other emergency situation without the prior written consent of the person, or the person’s next-of-kin if the person cannot provide consent, unless that disclosure was for a legitimate law enforcement, public safety, health care, or insurance purpose of pursuant to a court order. A person who knowingly violates this prohibition on disclosure is guilty of a disorderly persons offense, which is punishable by imprisonment for up to six months, or a fine of up to $1,000 or both.

In addition to any other right of action or recovery otherwise available under the laws of the state, a first responder who knowingly violates this prohibition, is liable to the person whose image was taken or disclosed, who may bring a civil action in the Superior Court.

The court may award (1) actual damages, but not less than liquidated damages computed at the rate of $1,000 for each violation of the bill; (2) punitive damages upon proof of willful or reckless disregard of the law; (3) reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred; and (4) such other preliminary and equitable relief as the court deems appropriate. TLS.

This content, and any other content on TLS, may not be republished or reproduced without prior permission from TLS. Copying or reproducing our content is both against the law and against Halacha. To inquire about using our content, including videos or photos, email us at [email protected].

Stay up to date with our news alerts by following us on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

**Click here to join over 20,000 receiving our Whatsapp Status updates!**

**Click here to join the official TLS WhatsApp Community!**

Got a news tip? Email us at [email protected], Text 415-857-2667, or WhatsApp 609-661-8668.


  1. i agree with such a law.
    BTW Emt’s shold be by a call to save lives, not to photograph.. it is a breach of trust that tehy owe to a patient

  2. Why did it take so long for such a law to be proposed!
    I can only imagine what families go through when they find out about personal tragedies or see horrifying pictures before they are even properly notified.

  3. I want to know why the need for th epictures in the first place, are they selling them to the newspaper? I mean I can understand for training purposes but the victim should not be in it and it doesnt get plastered all over facebook. I agree with this law 100%.

  4. Doc Patient privileges are different from a member of an emergency squad on scene. Its a good law that is long awaited..too many have to suffer even knowing that a loved one was in a horrific accident, but finding out before a notification by seeing it on a website or on the tv is just as disheartening
    Its a shame it comes to this..you as an emergency responder ask yourself if you want your family to find out before they are officially notified by the police or someone else, How would you feel?

  5. ha wait a second first responders cant do it but the media can ???? i have seen pic and vids on the news and on the scoop almost in real time. what is the diff ?

Comments are closed.