Senators Issue Letter: Abbott Responds With WIC Statement: Will Import Baby Formula From Ireland Facility

Eight Democrat senators have written a letter to the Secretary of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Thomas J. Vilsack asking him to tackle the baby formula industry’s “alarming level of corporate concentration” amid a shortage of the product.

Four companies, Abbott Nutrition, Mead Johnson, Gerber, and Perrigo, control almost 90 percent of the infant formula market. Abbott Nutrition, whose recall of some of its products has led to the shortage, alone controls around 40 percent of the market.

Such a level of concentration has created a “fragile system” that is unequipped to deal with “shocks in the supply chain,” the senators wrote in the May 13 letter. As a result, low-income families that rely on programs like the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) get “disproportionately” impacted.

In the first week of May, 43 percent of baby formula supplies were out of stock across American stores. The United States manufactures 98 percent of the infant formula it consumes.

50 to 66 percent of all infant formula sold in the country is bought through WIC

In the past three decades, WIC has awarded contracts for sourcing infant formula to just three companies: Abbott Nutrition, Mead Johnson, and Gerber. At present, Abbott is the sole-source WIC provider in 23 states and the District of Columbia.

Moreover, once WIC awards a contract to any company, the brand then gets a boost in non-WIC purchases in that specific state. For instance, when California ended its contract with Abbott and gave it to Mead Johnson in 2007, Abbott’s share of the market in the state went from 90 percent to 5 percent while that of Mead Johnson rose from 5 to 95 percent.

The letter acknowledges that the sole-source contract model has enabled “cost containment and the ability to serve more WIC participants.” However, the sole-source contract model might be contributing to the concentration in the market, it added.

“Under normal circumstances, this does not pose any immediate threats to the ability of families to provide nutrition to their babies and infants, but in the midst of a shock to the supply chain, it is clear that the current level of concentration has created a fragile system unable to meet the needs of vulnerable consumers,” the letter stated.

“This may merit exploring new ways to bolster competition in the market and ensure formula access for WIC participants, including the possibility of multi-source contracts.”

Meanwhile, Abbott is focusing on using its production facility in Cootehill, Ireland, to serve WIC consumers, the company said in a May 13 post.

“Abbott has been working with the USDA and WIC agencies and paying rebates on competitive products in states where Abbott holds the WIC contract when Similac is not available. Abbott will continue to pay rebates for competitive products through Aug. 31,” the company said.

“This means program participants will continue to be able to obtain formula, free of charge whether it is Similac or formula from another manufacturer.”

ABBOTT STATEMENT: NUTRITION, HEALTH AND WELLNESS | May 13, 2022

Since the recall, one of our priorities has been to mitigate the supply issues. In particular we’ve been focusing on production in our Cootehill, Ireland, facility to serve state Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children (WIC) consumers. Abbott has been working with the USDA and WIC agencies and paying rebates on competitive products in states where Abbott holds the WIC contract, when Similac is not available. Abbott will continue to pay rebates for competitive products through August 31. This means program participants will continue to be able to obtain formula, free of charge whether it is Similac or formula from another manufacturer.

We know that the recall has worsened the industry-wide infant formula shortage, and we have been working to get as much product into the hands of parents as we can. Since February:

  • We’ve air shipped millions of cans of infant formula powder into the U.S. from our FDA-registered facility in Cootehill, Ireland.
  • We have prioritized infant formula production at our Columbus, Ohio, facility, converting other liquid manufacturing lines into manufacturing Similac liquid ready-to-feed.
  • We are offering an increased number and value of coupons available for all our infant formula products, including Similac ready-to-feed, to enable customers to purchase formula, either free or deeply discounted.
  • And our other manufacturing facilities are running at full capacity as we continue to prioritize production of infant formula to help replenish the supply in the market.

At the same time, we have been working to address the FDA’s 483 observations so we can restart operations at the Sturgis, Mich., facility. We immediately began implementing corrective actions and subject to FDA approval, we could restart our Sturgis, Mich., site within two weeks.

We are confident that we can continue to produce safe, high-quality infant formula at all of our facilities as we have been doing for millions of babies around the world for decades.

Available WIC & Alternative WIC Baby Formulas

 

 

 

 

This content, and any other content on TLS, may not be republished or reproduced without prior permission from TLS. Copying or reproducing our content is both against the law and against Halacha. To inquire about using our content, including videos or photos, email us at [email protected].

Stay up to date with our news alerts by following us on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

**Click here to join over 20,000 receiving our Whatsapp Status updates!**

**Click here to join the official TLS WhatsApp Community!**

Got a news tip? Email us at [email protected], Text 415-857-2667, or WhatsApp 609-661-8668.

6 COMMENTS

  1. Finally, an answer that is short and straight to the point. I hope you’re right.
    Just one more question:
    Is my comment an infantile comment because of the issue it addresses, namely, infant formula, which categorizes the comment as an infantile comment, or because the comment itself is infantile?

Comments are closed.