Rick Perry To Drop Presidential Bid

CNN is reporting that Rick Perry tells supporters he is dropping his bid for GOP presidential nomination today. The decision currently leaves just four potential GOP candidates in the race. Meanwhile, Rick Santorum finished the Iowa Republican caucuses 34 votes ahead of Mitt Romney,

but CNN says the actual results may never be known, as results from several precincts are missing.

Remaining in the GOP race, are Mitt Romney, Ron Paul, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. TLS.

This content, and any other content on TLS, may not be republished or reproduced without prior permission from TLS. Copying or reproducing our content is both against the law and against Halacha. To inquire about using our content, including videos or photos, email us at [email protected].

Stay up to date with our news alerts by following us on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

**Click here to join over 25,000 receiving our Whatsapp Status updates!**

**Click here to join the official TLS WhatsApp Community!**

Got a news tip? Email us at [email protected], Text 415-857-2667, or WhatsApp 609-661-8668.

4 COMMENTS

4 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mr. Conservative
13 years ago

good, then all of ricks votes will go towards newt and that will bring newt above mitt! šŸ™‚

Yid
13 years ago

Just saying……. If the media manages to take out Newt, I am telling you that the conservative base will have no choice but to go to Ron Paul.

The conservative base DOES NOT WANT Romney. We had enough of pseudo-Rebublicans like Bob Dole and John McCain losing. We want real conservatives like Reagan.

Let us hope either Gingrich or Santorum win. Because if it looks like they won’t make it, watch how suddenly Ron Paul takes the nomination.

And Ron Paul WILL WIN over Obama,

Scary times ahead for America, if Gingrich is taken out by the elitist media.

Mr. Conservative
13 years ago

#2 agreed 100%

Scary stuff
13 years ago

I too echo Yid’s comment.

Thus, If Ron Paul, G-d forbid, were to get the GOP nomination, I would vote for the first time for a democrat, Mr. Obama.Ā 

So what’s so bad about Paul you might ask?Ā 
Let us not forget who Ron Paul is. It bears repeating.
Ā 
From YNet
Yitzhak Benhorin Published: 12.27.11, 23:53 / Israel NewsWASHINGTON – Republican presidential hopeful Ron Paul’s past statements are coming back to haunt him – and this time it’s about the US’ role in ending World War 2 and the Holocaust.
Following a controversial revelation by a former aide to the congressman, saying that Paul ā€œwishes Israel didn’t exist,ā€ another blogger said Tuesday that in 2009 Paul went on the record as saying that if he were the president of the United States during WWII he ā€œwouldn’t have risked American lives to end the Holocaust.ā€
Journalist Jeffrey Shapiro posted a 2009 interview he held with the GOP’s leading candidate, in which Paul clearly states that if it were up to him at the time, saving the Jews from annihilation in Europe would not have been a ā€œmoral imperative.ā€ ā€œI asked Congressman Paul: If he were president of the United States during World War II would he have sent American troops to Nazi Germany to save the Jews? And the Congressman answered: No, I wouldn’t.ā€ ā€œI wouldn’t risk American lives to do that. If someone wants to do that on their own because they want to do that, well, that’s fine, but I wouldn’t do that,ā€ Shapiro wrote.
Shapiro added that he later contacted Eric Dondero, Paul’s former top aide, who said that he had heard his boss make similar comments on various occasions. ā€œDondero told me that Paul had made similar comments to him, that ā€˜it was not worth it to intervene to save the Jews in World War II.ā€™ā€ ā€œI don’t think that’s because he’s an anti-Semite. It’s because he’s an extreme isolationist and he’s trying to be 100% principled–he doesn’t think there’s any reason to intervene for human rights or any other reason anywhere on the planet.ā€ Shapiro quoted Dondero as saying. Shapiro noted that when he first presented Paul’s startling statement about the Holocaust to major media outlets in the US, ā€œthey were so stunned they were afraid to publish my story, and as a result it has remained unpublished until now.ā€

When i saw this article, I could not believe my eyes!!

Point to Ponder: If Ron Paul, the ā€œprincipled isolationistā€, was President of the USA (G-d forbid) Ā instead of Harry Truman, can anyone guess who the world superpower would be today?

Therefore It is my opinion that Ron Paul is a dangerous man. His “principles” are way off-base.Ā 

How can anyone, knowing all the atrocities that Nazi’s ymā€sv did to the 6 million yidden be quoted as saying in 2009:

ā€œIt was not worth it to intervene to save the Jews in World War II.’
Ā 
Read that quote again from Ron Paul Presidential hopeful. And weep. Ā  “Not worth it.”

ā€œIt was not worth it to intervene to save the Jews in World War II.’

Here is the spin:

ā€œI don’t think that’s because he’s an anti-Semite. It’s because he’s an extreme isolationist and he’s trying to be 100% principled–he doesn’t think there’s any reason to intervene for human rights or any other reason anywhere on the planet.ā€ Shapiro quoted Dondero as saying.Ā 

I have two questions for Mr Paul:

Ā Forgetting about your isolationist Ā “principles” Mr. Paul, where is your humanity?

My Answer: you don’t have a shred of humanity. If the above referenced quotes are true, Ā You are a heartless individual. Ā 

Forgetting for a minute about your isolationist principles Ā  Where are your morality principles?

My answer: No morality. No humanity.Ā 

May G-d protect us from this heartless, cowardly ā€˜principled’ Ā individual.Ā 

One more point: Ron Paul needs to brush up on world history. America did not get involved in the second world war to save the Jews. Ā Ron Paul’s insinuating of same, is pure revisionism. America never bombed the tracks to Auschwitz.etc.Ā