Jackson Council President Calls on Residents to Oppose New Bill That Forces High Density Overdevelopment in Jackson

The Jackson Township Council has unanimously adopted a resolution strongly opposing newly introduced state legislation that would permit religious and nonprofit-owned properties to be developed at a density of up to 40 housing units per acre, bypassing local municipal zoning oversight.

Under that plan, any church, mosque, or synagogue can build high-density housing of up to 40 units per acre on its property as long as it has a 20% set-aside for affordable housing.

The Jackson Council is asking residents to contact state senators via email or telephone and ask them to vote no:

  • Email your legislators today and tell them to vote no on Senate bill 4736.
  • You can find the email address and contact information for each state legislator here: New Jersey State Senate Roster.

The proposed state bill, sponsored by Democrat Senators Troy Singleton and Benjie E. Wimberly, would mandate such high-density inclusionary housing projects as “permitted uses” under local zoning laws—removing the requirement for use variances so long as minimum affordable housing criteria and design standards are met.

“Jackson Township is being burdened already by the state to accommodate affordable housing and reluctantly, we are being forced to comply,” said Council President Mordechai Burnstein. “This new bill will not only further handcuff our ability to keep overdevelopment in check, it will force us to build more affordable housing than we are currently being forced to build. Everyone needs to reach out to the state legislators and tell them to vote no on this very dangerous and reckless bill.”

“Let’s be clear. This is a disaster. This Senate bill 4736 is an absolute disaster,” said Council Vice President Giuseppe Palmeri. “This would allow for high-density apartments in Jackson. 40 units per acre. So, I’m happy that my colleagues here, the council president, support opposing this, completely opposing this, and this resolution will go to every legislator that we oppose this, and it will be voted on by everybody in the state legislature. We need to be very loud about this. We cannot have this pass. We will look like Manhattan.”

Under the proposed legislation, qualifying projects could receive substantial incentives—including long-term tax exemptions—and automatically gain approval if they meet the state-mandated criteria. The bill also permits developers to exceed existing municipal height limits by an additional story.

The Council’s resolution notes that:

A blanket density of 40 units per acre is incompatible with Jackson Township’s suburban and environmentally sensitive areas.

  • Bypassing municipal use variances removes an essential layer of community review and public input.
  • Allowing height increases and expanded tax-exemption eligibility could burden local infrastructure, services, and schools without adequate municipal recourse.

“In New Jersey, we already follow COAH and state affordable housing requirements. But during this lame-duck session, a new bill is being pushed that would allow any registered nonprofit developer to build 40 housing units per acre with a 20% affordable set-aside — essentially paving the way for high-density apartment buildings in Jackson.” Council President Burnstein said. “After speaking with legislators from both parties over the past two weeks, many believe this bill may pass. While few people are enthusiastic about mandated affordable housing, we can all agree that if Trenton forces us to build it, it should be smart, responsible, and locally controlled. Forty units per acre is not smart development. That’s why this resolution is so important.”

The adopted resolution will be forwarded to Governor Phil Murphy, Senate President Nicholas Scutari, Assembly Speaker Craig Coughlin, and Jackson’s state legislative delegation. Township leaders hope state officials will reconsider the bill and allow local zoning and planning boards to make these decisions based on the needs of their own communities.

This content, and any other content on TLS, may not be republished or reproduced without prior permission from TLS. Copying or reproducing our content is both against the law and against Halacha. To inquire about using our content, including videos or photos, email us at [email protected].

Stay up to date with our news alerts by following us on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.

**Click here to join over 25,000 receiving our Whatsapp Status updates!**

**Click here to join the official TLS WhatsApp Community!**

Got a news tip? Email us at [email protected], Text 415-857-2667, or WhatsApp 609-661-8668.

10 COMMENTS

10 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jackson Township
8 days ago

עשו שונא ליעקב

Build baby build
8 days ago

Vote YES!!!! Time to tell all the bozos on Jackson board to get a life and let us build!!!!!!

Yehuda L.
Reply to  Build baby build
6 days ago

How about we tell the Board to keep fighting the State and not to force us to have insane amount of overbuilding.

If you appreciate building 40 homes on an acre go vote in your own Bozos.

Nobody in Jackson wants that.

Uncle Sam
8 days ago

Is this a veiled attempt to keep people from Lakewood moving to Jackson?

Long time Lakewooder
Reply to  Uncle Sam
8 days ago

Lakewood should adopt the same Resolution and forward it to the State. I can’t imagine having to live in an even more crowded town than we’re already living in..

Jewish in Jackson
8 days ago

40 units per acre? That’s way worse than Lakewood and not what we moved to Jackson for… vote NO…

Last edited 8 days ago by Jewish in Jackson
P S
8 days ago

If we wanted to live around apartment houses we would live in North Jersey, not Jackson. Do you want your taxes to double or triple to build new schools like the ones we just sold? Do you want the roads to be congested and deteriorated like Lakewood & Toms River. If not then contact your representative about defeating this bill

Realistically speaking
6 days ago

Just so people realize what everybody thinks whether it’s a good bill or a bad look at the reactions to the previous posts

Jeg
6 days ago

40 homes per acre? Absolutely not. How about let’s leave Jackson rural as it was intended. I like trees and grass, not concrete and asphalt. Let’s not ruin another town.

Steve
6 days ago

The people that have lived here for many years do not want high density city like growth, that is an environmental disaster .Thank you Jackson for fighting this !