Following Lavallette Tragedy, Toms River Senator Proposes Safety Barriers For Outdoor Dining

Following last week’s deadly crash at a Lavallette restaurant that killed a Toms River woman and injured seven others, state Senator Jim Holzapfel (R-Tom River) said today he will introduce legislation requiring restaurants with outdoor dining areas located near active roadways to install protective barriers between diners and vehicle traffic.

Holzapfel, who represents parts of Monmouth and Ocean counties, said the proposed legislation would establish a basic safety requirement for restaurants that offer outdoor dining directly adjacent to roadways.

“Outdoor dining is a great part of what makes our shore communities special, but we have to make sure it’s safe,” Holzapfel said in a statement. “If a restaurant wants to offer dining directly next to an active roadway, there should be a basic safety requirement for protective bollards or other approved barriers between diners and traffic so a simple meal out doesn’t suddenly turn to tragedy.”

According to Lavallette police, a 93-year-old woman was attempting to park outside the restaurant shortly after 11 a.m. Saturday when she accidentally pressed the accelerator instead of the brake. The vehicle traveled into the restaurant’s outdoor dining area and then into the building.

A 56-year-old Toms River woman, identified as Ursula Keating, was killed in the crash. Seven other restaurant patrons were injured and transported to the hospital. The driver suffered minor injuries.

Keating was the wife of Silverton Volunteer Fire Company Chief John Keating. Her death prompted an outpouring of support from fire departments and first responders throughout the area.

Holzapfel’s proposed legislation would address the issue statewide by requiring protective bollards or other approved barriers for qualifying outdoor dining areas located near active roadways.

Details of Holzapfel’s legislation, including the specific types of restaurants and outdoor dining areas that would be covered and the standards for approved barriers, are expected to be outlined when the bill is formally introduced.

The Lavallette crash remains under investigation.

This content, and any other content on TLS, may not be republished or reproduced without prior permission from TLS. Copying or reproducing our content is both against the law and against Halacha. To inquire about using our content, including videos or photos, email us at [email protected].

Stay up to date with our news alerts by following us on Twitter, Instagram and Facebook.
Got a news tip? Email us at [email protected], Text 415-857-2667, or WhatsApp 609-661-8668.

14 COMMENTS

14 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Term limits
24 days ago

Fix the cause instead of the accident part. A 93 yr old should NOT be driving. Make legislation for THAT instead.

shmendrik
Reply to  Term limits
24 days ago

Both are a problem.

O $ B
24 days ago

Retest all bad driver’s, no matter their age!

Lakewood Yid
Reply to  O $ B
23 days ago

There are various laws in various states. License renewal is typically every eight years for all. Some require in-person renewal after a certain age. Nineteen states require vision tests with the renewal after a certain age.
Texas and Indiana require renewal every 2 years at age 85+, Missouri every 3 years at age 70.

Obviously, people should self-evaluate, and family members and friends should take note, and help out. Remember, you may be saving the person – and others – from serious harm and/or legal issues.
It is also important for family members to be available to help drive seniors in their golden years, so that they don’t feel constrained, and they retain a sense of pride that they can get around – especially when they see people are vying to help them out, so they don’t feel a burden.
All this is done much, and we should just keep it up and do it more.
Group busses/vans from senior communities to shopping centers are pretty standard.

O $ B
Reply to  Lakewood Yid
23 days ago

I haven’t taken an age survey regarding drivers but there seems to be many more younger, inexperienced driver’s getting into accidents & those driver’s need to have their driving abilities retested

Lakewood Yid
Reply to  O $ B
23 days ago

For the elderly, it can be errors, and for the young, it can be over-self-confidence!

Ima
Reply to  O $ B
23 days ago

Most, if not all vehicle accidents involving driving into a building lately, were very elderly people who should not have been driving.

avraham
23 days ago

About 35 % of all senior citizens have eye issues.
The problem is that many seniors need some type of an eye surgery and their appointment is in 4 months.
They should not be driving until they get their surgery.

Lakewood Yid
23 days ago

Senior Driver License Renewal Rules: All 50 States (2026)
Also includes tips for having conversations – how to go about it

Puny Loves Blue
23 days ago

I agree that some people should be rested so what’s the problem? This is getting out of control

Lakewood Yid
Reply to  Puny Loves Blue
23 days ago

I think you meant to say ‘…should be retested’

Puny Loves Blue
Reply to  Lakewood Yid
22 days ago

They should be retested when is this going to pass in Nj ?

Molly Weasley
23 days ago

Nanny state strikes again. Not every tragedy needs a law.

Moish
22 days ago

How abt having mandatory that when u turn 80 u need another road test end if story