Legislation sponsored by Assemblywoman Linda Stender that would help promote cost-savings between local governments by holding the line on the annual fees charged for shared service agreements was approved by an Assembly panel today. “We all want to see shared services agreements to help control property taxes and help communities fit within the new two-percent cap, but we also know that these agreements can cost money upfront in many cases,” said Stender (D-Union/Middlesex/Somerset). “With this simple change, we can increase the reliability of shared service agreements and provide more incentives for local officials to consider this measure as a way to streamline costs. That’s good news for taxpayers.”
The bill (A-3625) would cap the annual fee increases for a shared service agreement at 2 percent, the same cap that is in place for local property tax levy increases. An increase in a shared services agreement could only exceed the two percent cap if the increase has been approved by the voters of each local unit that is a party to the agreement.
Under current law, local units of government are allowed to enter into a shared service agreement with another local unit(s) in an effort to reduce administrative expenses and save money through efficiencies of scale. For example, two neighboring municipalities that provide trash removal for their respective residents might enter into a shared service agreement that allows one of the municipalities to provide trash removal for the residents of both.
The bill was approved by the Assembly Housing and Local Government Committee by a vote of XX-XX and now awaits consideration by the full Assembly.
if I understand correctly in what way is the bill promoting shared services by capping the maximum inititial expense that sounds like demoting to me
We already have shared services wit other towns. We provide the service and they get the benefit. It’s always the larger municipality that carries the small ones. we are losing $$$ by doing this.