With New Jersey residents facing a massive spike in electricity rates set to take effect on June 1, Assemblyman Avi Schnall (D-30) has introduced two pieces of legislation aimed at reining in excessive utility costs and protecting consumers from unfair rate hikes.
“Families across New Jersey are already struggling with rising costs, and utility bills should not be another burden that forces them to make impossible financial choices,” Assemblyman Schnall said in unveiling the bills.
The bills are part of a broader package introduced by the Assembly Majority Caucus, which is working to counter rising electricity rates and bring relief to households and businesses across the state.
The first piece of legislation, A5460, introduced alongside Assemblywoman Rosy Bagolie (D-27), addresses how electric utility providers recover costs for infrastructure improvements. Under current law, utilities make investments into their infrastructure and then recoup those costs by raising customer rates—while making a profit on top of it. These rate hikes must be approved by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities (BPU), but there is currently no appropriate mechanism to cap excessive profits that directly impact consumers.
This legislation would require the BPU to determine the lowest reasonable amount of profit that utility companies should be able to make and cap rate hikes accordingly.
“Right now, utility companies can charge customers not just to cover their investments, but to rake in excessive profits in the process,” said Schnall. “Families have no choice but to pay these rates. There has to be a cap on what profit makes sense when it affects the lives of every single New Jerseyan. This bill ensures that rate hikes are based on what is fair—not what is most profitable for utility companies.”
The second bill, A5461, sponsored alongside Assemblyman Al Abdelaziz (D-35) and Assemblywoman Tennille McCoy (D-14), would reduce the amount of money utility companies are required to pay for solar energy.
Under existing law, utility companies must purchase a certain amount of solar energy at a mandated price, which contributes to higher costs for consumers. This legislation would lower the required cost of purchasing solar energy—but critically, it ensures that the savings from these lower costs go directly to lowering consumers’ utility bills rather than into the pockets of utility companies.
“This is about fairness. Right now, utility companies are paying top dollar for solar energy, and those costs are passed directly to customers,” said Schnall. “Lowering these costs should mean lower bills for New Jersey residents—not bigger profits for utility companies. This bill ensures that the savings go where they belong: back to the people paying the bills.”
Thank you Avi,
Keep it going…
Don’t let yourself from all the naa sayers!!
Very important. Start using fire wood to cook and heat your home. Use candlelight for light. It’s the cost of living in NJ. If you don’t want to pay for utilities, go old school. Welcome to 1825.
well guess what I have had a wood stove in my home since he late 1970’s ,yes its a lot of work but definitely reduces my electric bill and solar for me has worked out well , adding mini split ( heat pump) another way to help as they use less electric than baseboard heaters
Baseboard heaters shouldn’t be using any electricity, as it’s supposed to run off your boiler. Most boilers are gas boilers. As to your usage of wood burning stove, you might be from the less then hundredth of a percent in the civilized world doing that today.
The bill is dumb. Instead the goverment approves the hike just don’t approve it. Goverment creates a problem>>goverment creates a solution>>goverment touts itself as smart
Now that’s good news coming from Avi. – rather than scooter bans
Keep up the good work Avi,
Another worthless idea from worthless Democrats.
How about instead of reducing the amount they must pay for solar, eliminate the mandate. Why should utility companies be forced to subsidize solar power companies at customer expense.
How about doing something about the high delivery charge on the NJ Natural Gas company bill. The delivery charge for natural gas is approximately 3 times the cost of the gas. The delivery charge for electricity is approximately 1/3 the cost of the electricity.
what about legislation against irresponsible development?? that may be a bill everyone would enjoy (besides the developers)
How about legislation to CANCEL INCOME TAX AVI!!!
How about the thieves at NJ American water?
NJ American water is disaster,
It makes no sense why they’re 4X the Lakewood MUA bill.
This needs to be investigated and regulated. ASAP